There is an age old question, that I always found intriguing. A question I must admit, though intriguing, I never quit understood.
I understood that it creates an awareness that there is order to things. A place for everything and everything in its place.
But not the logic of asking the question in the first place – I thought the answer fairly obvious. Making the question clearly rhetorical in nature.
The question is: What came first, the Chicken, or the Egg?
On a very subconscious level, I would presume we all have an idea of the process of things. A process, which would indeed make this question irrelevant.
The issue, is that a part of the equation is missing from the question. There are – or should be – three pivotal points in that equation.
First: The Chicken
Second: The Progenitor – in this case the Cockerel.
The results: The Egg
I shall endeavour to shed some light on where I am going with this questions on whether or not the Chicken or the Egg came first.
It should be obvious, the one that came first must have been the Cock – erel. A Cockerel is what is known in layman’s terms as a Rooster.
While there are many animals in nature that produce asexually – I say many ,but I know none. However, I know, poultry is not among that subset of animals.
Based on this I would assume there must be a chicken and a cockerel to create and egg. You may find this to be crude. The questions is: can you disagree with my conclusion?
Mind you, I never arrived at this conclusion on my own. My aunt , a very demure woman. Had a T-shirt which engineered my arriving at this obviously very “profound” answer.
The T-shirt read: THE BIGGER THE COCK.. THE BRIGHTER THE MORNING.
If you have ever been in a rural area that had a Cockerel. You would have noted their obstreperous nature early in the morning.
However, their obstreperousness has nothing to do with what was on that T-shirt.
If you cannot figure out what it means, or how it led me to this point. You are obviously too young to be reading this.